
Crotchless Panties: Not All They're Cracked Up to Be
byJanet Choi, Sweet and Sour Editor
January 20, 2003 + Los Angeles, CA
It all began like this...
| nmyStephen: |
 |
Am I gonna have to bust another sadistic assignment on you? [see WWE article] |
| nmyJanet: |
 |
I could do a crotchless panty review. |
| nmyStephen: |
 |
oooOOOoooooo... I'll take a crotchless panty review! |
| nmyJanet: |
 |
oh boy. |
| nmyJanet: |
 |
okie doke |
| nmyStephen: |
 |
Do you own them already? |
| nmyJanet: |
 |
yep. |
| nmyJanet: |
 |
um... |
| nmyStephen: |
 |
what? |
| nmyJanet: |
 |
I just admitted to owning crotchless panties. |
| nmyStephen: |
 |
that's awesome! that's my Janet! |
| nmyStephen: |
 |
and soon... the entire newmoanyeah-reading world will know!!! |
| nmyStephen: |
 |
mwwaaahh hahahah!!! |
Continued like this...
| nmyStephen: |
 |
crotchless panties cha cha cha crotchless panties cha cha cha crotchless panties cha cha cha crotchless panties cha cha cha crotchless panties cha cha cha crotchless panties cha cha cha |
And ended like this...
| nmyStephen: |
 |
wearin' yer undies? |
| nmyJanet: |
 |
no. er...you know I don't think I can do this review this week |
| nmyStephen: |
 |
do you wanna bump it to next week? |
| nmyJanet: |
 |
yeah, if that's okay. I'm not really capable of wearing crotchless panties right now...if you know what I mean. |
| nmyStephen: |
 |
UUUGHHGHGGGHGHOOOTTTTPRRLSPPPPPHHHH! |
So, menstrual cycle over, I decided to finally wear my crotchless panties (of the g-string variety) for an entire day. If you're not familiar with this type of undergarment, they are panties with a slit between the legs, so designed for easy access to the female genitalia. Why one would require easy access to that area goes without saying. I hope.
I should preface all of this by saying that when it comes to panties, I am a thong girl. I abhor the type of panties that cover any part of the asschecks as they are accomplices to the fashion crime VPL (visible panty line). I'm truly stunned when I hear women compare thongs to "butt-floss." Either they're wearing them incorrectly or have vast, valley-like genitalia in which a parachute would get lost. No, the "butt-floss" comparison should be reserved for g-strings for those are literally floss-like, usually with a single elastic band resting right in a woman's crevice. My g-string panties, being crotchless, instead have two elastic bands, in an attempt to maintain the illusion that this was an article of clothing and not a wispy waist accessory.
Test #1: Walking
I'd forgotten I was wearing underwear at all the first few steps. Then I remembered. The elastic bands seemed to have some difficulty deciding where they wanted to be. But once they found spots, I'd again forgotten I was wearing underwear. Then I remembered. Altering my movement drastically, like when climbing stairs or squatting, awoke the dormant elastic bands. But once they found spots, I'd again forgotten I was wearing underwear. Then I remembered. This cycle would continue all day.
Test #2: Sitting
The proclivity to forget I was wearing underwear had something to do with the fact that the essential part of the undergarment had been removed. Armed with this knowledge beforehand, I decided to conduct my test-drive in a skirt, as going commando-esque in pants can be not only uncomfortable but a tad messy. At rest, a body wearing crotchless g-string panties will notice a slight draft. Not an entirely unpleasant sensation. Actually, quite refreshing. But, as previously mentioned, altering my movement caused the elastic bands to shift, so it took a moment upon sitting for them to re-position themselves.
Test #3: Urinating
Yes. It's true. I tried to pee while wearing my crotchless panties, tho I left this test for the very end of the day in order to avoid wandering around in potentially urine-soaked undergarments. I couldn't shake the fact that I still had my panties on, but post-wipe it appeared that there was little contact with the elastic. If all panties were crotchless, perhaps the lines in women's public restrooms would be a non-issue.
Test #4: Sexing
The most crucial test but -- sorry, folks -- I was unable to perform it as my boyfriend is 1,000 miles away. However, given the accommodating nature of the panties, my assumption is they don't stand in the way of a good time.
At the end of the day, I came to the conclusion that wearing crotchless g-string panties for an extended period of time is a bad idea. It's not that my special parts were lacerated, but they were invaded by things with the potential to lacerate. Crotchless g-string panties are perhaps best suited for a brief rendezvous in a dark alley. Or a restroom trip at an amusement park.
|